You may have heard about Balatro recently β it's the latest indie sensation currently doing the rounds, and it's truly excellent. The roguelike deckbuilder has you playing poker hands to score points, and using joker cards and other upgrades to amplify those points to potentially stratospheric levels β it's tremendous. However, that basic poker element at its very core appears to be causing some unforeseen problems.
PEGI, Europe's video game ratings board, has suddenly changed Balatro's classification with no prior warning to publisher Playstack. Awarded a 3+ rating for release, it has now been changed to an 18+ on the basis of "prominent gambling imagery". You can see the difference on the PS Store listings; in the UK it shows this updated rating, while in the US, the ESRB rates it Everyone 10+, with a qualifier about "gambling themes".
Worse still, the classification change means the game has been delisted in various European territories across console storefronts. While it's unclear which ones are affected, we know the game no longer shows up on the UK's Nintendo eShop, for example.
Playstack has issued a statement about the issue:
As mentioned in the above post, Balatro's connection to gambling is minimal, though the use of playing cards and chips in its presentation are likely to be causing this headache. Hopefully this is resolved soon, even if it does mean the game gets a stronger age rating than planned.
What do you make of this kerfuffle? Shuffle the deck in the comments section below.
[source twitter.com]
Comments 25
I can honestly see why, but for ot to have already passed and released; who made the error in the first place?
Genuinely great game though - played it for a few days whilst waiting for FF7, and a lovely addictive timesink! Even if I don't play it for a while, they have my money, and they deserve it - I even plugged it on my socials, which is mainly for bugs I find π€£
Still there in my country, which is nice since I plan to buy it sooner or later. Looks like a lot of fun indeed.
Ah yes, pornography, hardcore drugs and graphical violence, all things on the same level as playing cards.
Its honestly astounding that you could sell lootboxes on games meant for 10 year olds but a card game where no real money is spent gets an 18 rating, so stupid.
There's a super easy work-around on Switch. Create an account set in a region that the game hasn't been delisted. Buy it, download it, and then play it on your regular account.
I canβt imagine they would change the age rating over the inclusion of playing cards, solitaire seems to be a nearly worldwide accepted time sink, but no one is using chips with cards unless they are gambling. π€·π»ββοΈ
Iβm going to chalk this up to all the people the past few years complaining about loot boxes in video games, unintended consequences.
Well this is a big mistake. Poker in itself is not gambling. It's just often used for gambling. Just like sports. Hopefully they fix this sooner rather than later.
This approach would mean the gambling scenes in Casino Royale would make that film an 18+ whereas currently it's a 12A even though it has people being violently beaten, shot and killed, and James Bond's double-Os being smashed with a knotted rope.
This is bogus. The game doesnβt have anything that resembles actual gambling. This is a poor decision by PEGI.
Itβs absolutely brilliant. This is bizarre but I mean, I guess I sort of understand the logic as itβs pretty much Poker without any money at stake.
And yet most top sports are filled with gambling adverts every break.
18 seems a bit harsh. Especially considering prominence poker, an actual poker gambling simulation, is a 12. You can even buy chips lol.
This is embarrassing.
I would love to see Playstack sue for damages for something this absurd.
You have to pay to have a game certificate with PEGI and other ratings boards, surely the developer is due a massive refund for this f**k up?
Played it for a bit and had fun.
It really has nothing to do with gambling except it uses a few poker terms.
From what I've read the game isn't even based on poker, but on a cardgame called Big Two.
Yet sports games where you gamble with actual money get to maintain their rating for kids.
Absolute morons making the decisions on these things. I bet they sit there saying to each other "well these are the rules- we just enforce them." Well change the damn rules, and get a new job
another PEGI rating no one cares about... Same bunch of clowns as WHO
Great game. I had to Uninstall it because it was too addictive and I'm busy lol. But yes, thus is a shame. I absolutely get where the classification board is coming from, but very disruptive to change post release. Not really their fault.
if there's no money involved its not gambling its just a game you play.
It's kinds stupid, then games with lootbox and gacha systems have lower rating then this game, because they are much worse then casino.
99% of games include elements of chance. Cards = evil. Sound logic π€¦ if people played Uno in casinos for money's you'd have the same moronic reaction.
I guess, until it's back in EU, you can get it on a different store. But seems kinda dumb.
I mean gambling themes makes sense to inform for there, there was an AO rated gambling game that did and I think it's one of the only ones that got that rating from memory. It was proper gambling too so it made sense why it was put up there.
Good luck to them working it out to put it back on sale though. Whether this change has made people more aware of the game also.
For more out there themes it makes sense but gambling is what it is even if yes sports and others had done so too in certain forms.
No real money trading in this game though. If it was more scaled differently for a card game then maybe the rating would be different. When is Mario 64 DS/others with the Luigi card game going to get a rating change. XD I know it's not the same but still.
We see casino levels in games or casinos in TV shows that are PG, same with Night Clubs. But the places don't match the ratings it's just a location not the themes, the characters or player is or isn't gambling right?
This shows that big money wins. A FIFA game where the chance of you "winning" a rare card is so slim it would be a safer bet to start gambling for real and after a year all your spend money is useless.
Mobile games where you have to gamble to get your stuff and have to spend as much as buying a house to max your character is OK yeah so fair this PEGI rating.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...